- From: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 19:09:13 +0200
- To: "'Antoine Isaac'" <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
I was just wondering whether CC REL http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CC_REL is a reasonably simple approach that can be recommended, or at least mentioned as a candidate for best practice? > -----Original Message----- > From: Antoine Isaac [mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl] > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 6:51 PM > To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: Two blog posts that may be of interest > > Hi Steve, > > I've never said (and I believe neither have Leigh) that machine > readability is useless. What we're questioning is the relevance of > super-complex frameworks. > Most observed cases of data re-use cry for simple conditions. If one > has to fulfill 15 different conditions that are hard and absolutely > not standardized in order to re-use a dataset, one will probably > abstain, even if these conditions have been described in a machine- > readable way. > > Antoine > > On 5/28/14 11:39 PM, Steven Adler wrote: > > I disagree. We are a long way from universal license terms and > machine readability of terms and conditions would provide benefits to > large and small data consumers alike. > >
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2014 17:09:57 UTC