RE: [BP - PRE] Data preservation already taken care of ?

Dear Mr. Guéret

The WG must state its scope. If this WG wants to address data preservation, a first step must be to review previous works and in particular the LTANS: it is not a trivial work.

I wrote the wiki page of Data preservation as an assignment following a discussion during a meeting
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Data_preservation


This only addresses data (resource) preservation. URI preservation is a related but distinct
  http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html


Regards
Tomas


From: Christophe Guéret [mailto:christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 2:46 PM
To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Cc: Phil Archer
Subject: [BP - PRE] Data preservation already taken care of ?

Hoi,

It does not seem "PRE" has been claimed by any BP document yet so let's use it for the "Data Preservation" one is that is ok with everyone ;-)

I was just about to create the wiki page to put some content in but found out this page already existed : http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Data_preservation

It reads "Data preservation should be out of scope for the Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group (DWBP WG) as data preservation is a large complex field. DWBP should be about how to access data and not how to preserve it. The DWBP WG should use the work of other groups such as Long-Term Archive and Notary Services (ltans). The Long-Term Archive Service Requirements should illustrate the complexity of this field. A lighter read might be A System for Long-Term Document Preservation"
Not that I fundamentally disagree with that but I can not remember such a finite decision was been taken by the group (I did miss many calls). Are we still looking at producing a BP for data preservation or not ?

BTW, to give you an update on that, we are busy at DANS implementing a system tailored for the preservation of Linked Data - Open or not - and our first prototype has a distinction between what belong to the data preservation part (and is thus shared with PNGs, PDFs, etc) and what is more specific to Linked Data. It seems to me that though the former is (clearly ?) out of scope for our group we could still provide some interesting guidance for the later.
Cheers,
Christophe
--
Onderzoeker
+31(0)6 14576494
christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl<mailto:christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>


Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)

DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op www.dans.knaw.nl<http://www.dans.knaw.nl> voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en NWO.



Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres:

DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl<mailto:info@dans.kn> | www.dans.knaw.nl


Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!
http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/


e-Humanities Group (KNAW)
[Image removed by sender. eHumanities]<http://www.ehumanities.nl/>