- From: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 14:05:17 +0200
- To: "'Leigh Dodds'" <leigh@ldodds.com>
- Cc: "'Lee, Deirdre'" <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>, "'DWBP WG'" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
[...] > > In my view, there a two different issues: > > > > 1. Data may not be complete, correct or timely > > [...] > > > > 2. Data may be moved or disappear without warning > > [...] > > Both of these are important to capture. Have you and the rest of the > working group looked through the questions in the ODI Open Data > Certificates? Both of these issues are addressed. Publishers are asked > to provide a quality statement for their datasets as well as pointers > to support information. Datasets can only achieve the higher grades if > the publisher is committing to regular supply. > > Here's an example certificate: > > https://certificates.theodi.org/datasets/353/certificates/11801 > Great! These are the things that I think data providers should be encouraged to say about their data. We should look how to include the idea of such certificates' in the best practice. Makx.
Received on Thursday, 22 May 2014 12:05:50 UTC