- From: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 11:39:42 +0200
- To: "'Ivan Herman'" <ivan@w3.org>, "'Phil Archer'" <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: "'DWBP Public List'" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Ivan writes: > > Just a minor correction: though this is not yet decided, my > expectation is that the group will not define one mechanism but open > the door to several. This may also include the well-known location > approach. > This opinion triggers a question in my mind. I wonder whether the goal of DWBP is Either: a. Give advice to publishers to do things in a certain way so that re-users know what to expect if a publisher follows the best practice. Or: b. Outline a number of principles that publishers should apply and that may be implemented in various ways and that allow several existing approaches to co-exist. I am happy either way, but I think it is important to have consensus about the principle. Makx.
Received on Friday, 16 May 2014 09:40:15 UTC