- From: Newton Calegari <newton@nic.br>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 00:42:49 -0300
- To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <A23F2516-D6C1-4086-BD26-BDB9E5C3FCE7@nic.br>
Hello DWBP, I'm following the "rule" suggested by the Laufer: The [BP - URI] label refers to the topic "URI Design and Management for Persistence" [1]. At the begin of the week I've created a wiki page [1] to write our drafts about URI Design. I've been editing this document with some thoughts and some texts found about the topic. In the document I put a snippet about good and bad pratices for persistent URIs extracted from the ''D7.1.3 - Study on persistent URIs" document (co-authored by Phill) [2]. In addition to that, I was wondering if should we merge this BP URI Doc with the "Data on the Web URI Best Practices (durip)" [3], that is the document written bu Carrasco exposing some good uses and recomendations of URIs to access data on the web. What do you think about it? [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/URI_Design_and_Management_for_Persistence [2] https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/c0/7d/10/D7.1.3%20-%20Study%20on%20persistent%20URIs.pdf [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Data_on_the_Web_URI_Best_Practices Regards, Newton
Received on Friday, 16 May 2014 03:43:23 UTC