Re: Timetables for our work (wiki pages)

This makes sense, I was a little confused by the timetable on the
vocabularies stating "Starting now" :-) .    Yes I'll do what I can to help
with use case contributions.

Thanks,

Eric


On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Steven Adler <adler1@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> I agree.  We have a great group with lots of different perspectives and
> its worth taking the time to explore those perspectives through the study
> of use cases.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Steve
>
> Motto: "Do First, Think, Do it Again"
>
>
>  From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> To: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org> Date: 02/10/2014
> 03:25 PM Subject: Re: Timetables for our work (wiki pages)
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've volunteered for editing one vocabulary if I'm needed. But I'd have to
> say that while enthusiasm is good (it's really great to be in such group!),
> it seems a bit premature to start side meetings about the vocabularies now.
> Let's first gather use cases and requirements!
> We have time. And actually it's probably more efficient use of our time to
> start later but with a clearly defined scope, than to start now and end up
> exhausting ourselves against a artefact with unmanageable scope. Once we've
> put our beloved darlings in these vocabularies, it will be harder to kill
> them if we find out that there is little requirement for them.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>
> On 2/10/14 7:17 PM, Eric Stephan wrote:
> > Super!   I'd like to work on the Data usage description vocabulary, as
> editor or contributor.   I've also heard other names going forward as
> editors.  Can we establish volunteers for editors and contributor this week
> so that we can begin meeting?
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Eric
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org <
> mailto:hadley@linkedgov.org <hadley@linkedgov.org>>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi all,
> >
> >     I've made us a few wiki pages to help focus our work.  These pages
> should take you through the W3C steps of consensus, feedback,
> implementations and revision needed to complete each deliverable.
> >
> >     (The actual writing is up to you!)
> >
> >     The Timetable pages are signposted from the main wiki page [1], and
> are here for clarity:
> >
> >     1.  Use cases
> >     https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Use_cases_timetable
> >
> >     2.  Best practices
> >     https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/BP_timetable
> >
> >     3.  Data usage description vocabulary
> >     https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Data_usage_vocab_timetable
> >
> >     4.  Quality and granularity vocabulary
> >     https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Quality_vocab_timetable
> >
> >     Bernadette and Deirdre, as editors of the Use cases document, the
> Use Cases Timetable is YOURS.  It should help you keep yourselves
> organised, but it will also help us chairs know where we can assist you.
>  We'd be grateful if you could keep it up to date.
> >
> >     As we get editors for the other documents, they will then get to
> play with their timetable documents too.
> >
> >     Hope these are helpful!  They are working pages for us;  feel free
> to change them as you find appropriate.
> >
> >     Cheers,
> >
> >         Hadley
> >
> >
> >
> >     [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Main_Page#Main_Deliverables
> >
> >     Hadley Beeman
> >     Chair
> >     W3C Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group
> >
> >
>
>
>
>