- From: Steven Adler <adler1@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:18:38 -0500
- To: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF27E4490F.974A0F60-ON85257DB1.004E953C-85257DB1.004E9C69@us.ibm.com>
Do first. Get Feedback. Revise if necessary. Best Regards, Steve Motto: "Do First, Think, Do it Again" |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org> | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |12/17/2014 09:13 AM | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |What is the path forward on BP scoping and comments? | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Hi all, I've really appreciated the exchange of ideas and concerns. Not wanting the BP editors and contributors to lose momentum, what is the path forward? Do we as a working group need to reach consensus? Do the editors make the decision about scoping? If a consensus is required, do we want to spend the remaining time this week putting forward proposals for the call? If consensus is not required, do the editors have enough input from the working group to make a decision on scoping? One possible path forward is just putting in Issues directly in the draft document and moving on for the time being. Thanks, Eric S
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2014 10:58:56 UTC