- From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:24:32 -0800
- To: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Cc: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMFz4jh50ZU2pa3yqFmmBJHPdN_OxEUSqxkhzX7UBuP+VNfYkw@mail.gmail.com>
>>Then, the question is: Is data usage information relevant to our context? I think its difficult to talk about the addressing best practices of the open data ecosystem without addressing data usage. >> In my opinion, it is important because we are talking about Data on the Web in general and not only about Publishing Data on the Web. +1 Eric S On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote: > > Hi Eric and Makx, > > Thanks for your comments and suggestions! > > I'm gonna rewrite the Abstract considering your suggestions. However, I'm > not sure about the suggested changes for sentence 3. The main idea behind > this sentence is that it could be nice to have information about data > usage. When possible, data consumers should provide information about data > usage in such a way that it will be possible to find out who is using the > data and how data has been used. I don't see this is an obligation, but as > a recommendation (best practice). > > If data usage information is important to our context, I believe that we > should have BP that recommend how/when to gather this information. > > Then, the question is: Is data usage information relevant to our context? > > In my opinion, it is important because we are talking about Data on the > Web in general and not only about Publishing Data on the Web. > > kind regards, > Bernadette > > > > 2014-12-16 12:52 GMT-03:00 Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>: > >> Eric, >> >> >> >> Thanks for proposed edits. Just a couple of remarks in-line: >> >> >> >> *1: “This document provides best practices related to the publication and >> usage of data on the Web designed to help support a self-sustaining >> ecosystem.”* >> >> No changes just comments for sentence 1: Loved the first sentence >> particularly the term “self-sustaining ecosystem”, this concept to me >> embodies the concept of making the web data more valuable to the world >> community than it is today. >> >> In this sentence, it is not entirely clear to which noun the clause >> starting with ‘designed’ refers. Maybe better: >> >> >> >> “*This document provides best practices related to the publication and >> usage of data on the Web. These best practices are designed to help support >> a self-sustaining ecosystem*.” >> >> >> >> 2: “*Data should be published, discovered and understood by humans and >> machines.”* >> >> Suggested changes for sentence 2: I recommended changing the second >> sentence to underscore producing and consuming data can be done by machines >> and humans. >> >> This now implies that humans and machines should publish data. My >> suggestion: >> >> >> >> “*Data should be published in such a way that it can be discovered and >> understood by humans and machines*.” >> >> >> >> 3*: “**Publishers should make data discoverable and when reused >> consumers should acknowledge the data publisher. “* >> >> Suggested changes for sentence 3: I had to read this sentence several >> times before I felt like like I understood the intent. I recommended the >> above rewording to make it a bit clearer, hopefully the original meaning >> was changed. >> >> I think you did indeed change the meaning. The original sentence said >> that the *re-use* of data should be discoverable. However, I do already >> have a problem with the original sentence because it contains instructions >> to re-users that may not always be valid. It seems to say that if a company >> takes data from the Web, they need to advertise that they did (ShareAlike) >> and need to acknowledge the source (Attribution). I wonder if we want to go >> that far. For example, I don’t think there is a requirement for re-users of >> data to make their product or service available on the Web or to advertise >> it, and if data is published in the public domain (or under a CCZero >> licence), a publisher does not ask for attribution so why make this a best >> practice? >> >> >> >> Makx. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Bernadette Farias Lóscio > Centro de Informática > Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >
Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2014 18:25:00 UTC