- From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:08:42 -0300
- To: Manuel Tomas Carrasco-Benitez <Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu>
- Cc: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANx1PzzvSYO0+TZOPLM0npLMkAtJBaac41xG_zsh-DG8osM8-g@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Tomas, Thank you for your proposal! My comments are inline: * BP - candidate sections > If there are no objections, I will merge into > http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html > > http://dragoman.org/bpc.html I think it is better to wait a while before merging the two documents. We should take a better look into the document of [1] ( http://dragoman.org/bpc.html) to see how to merge the two documents. It is important to extract just the information that it will be useful for the BP. > > > and some sections from > http://dragoman.org/comuri.html#uri-metadata-1 > > It should cover the comments below. > > > * Data on the Web Lifecycle > The phases should be ordered - for example, publication should be before > archiving > http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#lifecycle I agree with you! We're gonna change the order. Could you please explain in which sections the information below could be included in the BP document? > * Direct metadata identification > Direct identification of metadata is the URI syntactic mechanism to > identify variants and URI metadata. > > > * Formats for the URI metadata > There should be a "combined human-machine format" that it is both, human > and machine readable. > This should be a separated specification and not in the BP. > > > * Data vs. resource > Clarify both concepts. For example, > - "data identification" > - "resource identification" > > > Regards > Tomas > > Thank you! Bernadette [1] http://dragoman.org/bpc.html -- Bernadette Farias Lóscio Centro de Informática Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 14:09:31 UTC