RE: Category vs skos:ConceptScheme

• From: Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>
• Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 13:28:55 +0300
• To: <public-dwbp-comments@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <024f01d1d83a$5daf08f0$190d1ad0$@ontotext.com>

> Given that dqv:Dimension is subclass of	skos:Concept, I think that:
> - dqv:Category should be subclass of skos:ConceptScheme
> - dqv:inCategory should be subproperty of skos:inScheme

(It's not good to answer my own email, and I should have read to the end
before posting this, sorry)

dqv:Category is a subclass of skos:Concept; so dqv:inCategory cannot be
subproperty of skos:inScheme.

But this begs some questions:
- why dqv:Category is a subclass of skos:Concept not skos:ConceptScheme?
- what concept scheme(s) are supposed to be used for Category and Dimension
individuals?
- maybe dqv:inCategory should be subproperty of skos:broader?

Received on Thursday, 7 July 2016 10:29:20 UTC