- From: Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 13:34:05 +0300
- To: <public-dwbp-comments@w3.org>
> Instead of making a new property, > maybe it's better to use schema:rangeIncludes? (It's not good to answer my own email, and I should have read to the end before posting this, sorry) daq:expectedDataType has different semantics from schema:rangeIncludes: - daq:expectedDataType expresses the expected range of daq:value in a particular situation (a dqv:QualityMeasurement using THIS metric) - schema:rangeIncludes expresses the range of THIS property I have a different question about daq:expectedDataType that I'll raise separately.
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2016 10:34:29 UTC