dqv:expectedDataType

• From: Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>
• Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 17:52:23 +0300
• To: <public-dwbp-comments@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <01a501d1d796$01feff50$05fcfdf0$@ontotext.com>

Instead of making a new property, 
maybe it's better to use schema:rangeIncludes?
That's a lot more prevalent than daq:expectedDataType

Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2016 14:52:50 UTC