W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-comments@w3.org > August 2015

Re: Data Quality Vocabulary - feedback welcome!

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 12:46:44 +0200
Message-ID: <55CDC714.1070704@few.vu.nl>
To: <public-dwbp-comments@w3.org>
Dear Christoph,

Thanks for the comment. Well spotted. Actually this points out that there's still some confusion about W3C's handling of formal issues. Historically there is a specific issue tracker [1], in which we would raise issues following comments, as yours, as I've just made for yours [2].
The problem is now that we've moved to Github for our editorial process, we inherit github's issue tracking possibility in parallel to the existing system. Without having given too much thought about it, obviously.
We're going to discuss it internally...

Cheers,

Antoine

[1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/
[2] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/197

On 8/14/15 12:34 PM, Christoph LANGE wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Antoine Isaac on 2015-08-14 12:05:
>> The W3C Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group has recently
>> published a first draft for a Data Quality Vocabulary (DQV):
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-vocab-dqv-20150625/
>
> I was going to make a minor suggestion for improvement: in the "Other
> locations" header section, you could change the link "File a bug" to
> point to the GitHub issue tracker.  (I wouldn't point it to
> .../issues/new, to encourage people to first look whether an issue has
> been filed already.)
>
> However then I realised that this GitHub project doesn't even have issue
> tracking set up.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christoph
>
Received on Friday, 14 August 2015 10:47:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:38:11 UTC