Re: Data Quality Vocabulary - feedback welcome!

We have an issue tracker as you say, Antoine.

Comments are invited via this mailing list which is publicly archived 
(https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-comments/)

I deliberately disabled the GH issue tracker in the repo to avoid having 
to track issues in multiple places. GH has no guarantee of persistence 
and no integration with our other systems. That makes it suboptimal IMO. 
There are other aspects that are clearly good - closing issues when pull 
requests are accepted and so on - that's all good and we're working on 
possible integration methods, but they're not in place yet.

Phil.



On 14/08/2015 11:46, Antoine Isaac wrote:
> Dear Christoph,
>
> Thanks for the comment. Well spotted. Actually this points out that
> there's still some confusion about W3C's handling of formal issues.
> Historically there is a specific issue tracker [1], in which we would
> raise issues following comments, as yours, as I've just made for yours [2].
> The problem is now that we've moved to Github for our editorial process,
> we inherit github's issue tracking possibility in parallel to the
> existing system. Without having given too much thought about it, obviously.
> We're going to discuss it internally...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/197
>
> On 8/14/15 12:34 PM, Christoph LANGE wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Antoine Isaac on 2015-08-14 12:05:
>>> The W3C Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group has recently
>>> published a first draft for a Data Quality Vocabulary (DQV):
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-vocab-dqv-20150625/
>>
>> I was going to make a minor suggestion for improvement: in the "Other
>> locations" header section, you could change the link "File a bug" to
>> point to the GitHub issue tracker.  (I wouldn't point it to
>> .../issues/new, to encourage people to first look whether an issue has
>> been filed already.)
>>
>> However then I realised that this GitHub project doesn't even have issue
>> tracking set up.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Christoph
>>
>
>

-- 


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1

Received on Friday, 14 August 2015 11:10:20 UTC