- From: Harshvardhan J. Pandit <me@harshp.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:11:05 +0100
- To: Georg Philip Krog <georg@signatu.com>, Data Privacy Vocabularies and Controls Community Group <public-dpvcg@w3.org>
Hi. Thanks for sharing this resource for cloud technologies. My thoughts: - Service type corresponds closely to how we want to categorise technologies, but some of them are ad-hoc industry terms that we should not adopt (e.g. VMWare connectivity) - Service category is a higher/broader level concept than type within the tech taxonomy, and similarly has some terms that should be better named within DPV e.g. "App modernization" can be "DevOps" (which I think is how AWS/Azure define it). An open question - do we only want to define the categories from this list or do we also want to define instances e.g. products and services from Google/AWS/Azure etc.? - my concern: I don't want to only model big-tech products, there is a large ecosystem at play here and we shouldn't offer endorsement without due consideration. - value proposition to model these 'instances' is convenience of use as they have large-scale adoptions, so to have the best of both worlds we invite these as external contributions which will be extensions to tech taxonomy Regards, Harsh On 18/10/2023 18:36, Georg Philip Krog wrote: > Dear all, > > Link to cloud technologies: > https://cloud.google.com/docs/get-started/aws-azure-gcp-service-comparison <https://cloud.google.com/docs/get-started/aws-azure-gcp-service-comparison> > > Best regards, > > -- > Georg Philip Krog > > signatu <https://signatu.com> -- --- Harshvardhan J. Pandit, Ph.D Assistant Professor ADAPT Centre, Dublin City University https://harshp.com/
Received on Tuesday, 24 October 2023 11:11:18 UTC