Documenting external terms used in DPV specs

Hi. shows how DPV can specify 
use of other vocabularies in its specs. The example is regarding use of 
DCMI for DPIA related concepts.

Moving ahead, I will be pushing for establishing such usage 
recommendations at various levels. For example, dct:title and 
dct:description for ALL concepts to specify title and descriptions 
respectively. Same for other DCMI terms. This recommendation will be 
formally provided as part of the Base vocabulary section as well as specific contextual 
interpretations in each section (as the DPIA example shows).

For the background on why I ended up with this approach, please see the 
thread starting from I 
tested implementations on the ~5 different approaches from the thread, 
and the current one (using skos:scopeNote) is what I found to be most 
simplest to understand and easiest to maintain without eroding the 
semantics of those terms.


Harshvardhan J. Pandit, Ph.D
Research Fellow
ADAPT Centre, Trinity College Dublin

Received on Sunday, 30 October 2022 15:28:06 UTC