- From: Harshvardhan J. Pandit <me@harshp.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 17:50:54 +0100
- To: Mark Lizar <mark@openconsent.com>
- Cc: Data Privacy Vocabularies and Controls Community Group <public-dpvcg@w3.org>
Hi. I see lots of problematic terms and mis-interpretations in the email. I think I have mentioned these before in relation to some wiki page on Kantara's site - though I do not remember the exact place/time. For example, Legitimate Interest is NOT related to consent - definitely not as implied. Legitimate interest means carrying out activities without a contract or consent. By stating legitimate interest is a form of implied consent, this leads to all sorts of incorrect and funny interpretations of what is taking place. Another example, Contract is stated as implied consent. Even if taken at the broadest possible interpretation where "consent" also refers to agreement to enter into contract, this cannot be "implied" for the contract to be valid. I'm by no means a lawyer or a legal expert, but I strongly suggest getting these terms in line with what their existing use in law and practices is considered the norm. P.S. I had issues reading the email due to embedded HTML, but it looked fine in a web client / browser. Regards, Harsh On 28/07/2022 17:11, Mark Lizar wrote: > Hi Harsh, (DPV Colleagues) > > It would be great to get some feedback on this work, and to see if can > be useful to other projects and DPV. > -- --- Harshvardhan J. Pandit, Ph.D Research Fellow ADAPT Centre, Trinity College Dublin https://harshp.com/
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2022 16:49:48 UTC