- From: OCG Info <info@openconsent.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:33:56 +0000
- To: "Harshvardhan J. Pandit" <me@harshp.com>
- CC: Data Privacy Vocabularies and Controls Community Group <public-dpvcg@w3.org>, Paul Knowles <paul.knowles@humancolossus.org>, "jan@linaltec.com" <jan@linaltec.com>
Thanks Harsh - Calendar is working now, Is there a format for use cases? Also, has anyone else considered using DPV for purpose specification? ( would this be considered under requirements for the application of DPV?) - Mark > On 7 Jul 2020, at 07:27, Harshvardhan J. Pandit <me@harshp.com> wrote: > > Dear Mark, all. > > The DPVCG meeting call is on JUL-08. Please refer to the agenda for details: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dpvcg/2020Jul/0003.html > > Reg. GA4GH - the DPVCG is not 'exploring' it at the moment AFAIK. > The last mention of this topic on the mailing list is wrt the meeting with Adrian Thorogood of GA4GH (https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dpvcg/2020Jun/0014.html) > > On this note, I would like to re-emphasise my mail yesterday about future deliverables and that the DPVCG welcomes use-cases / requirements for application of DPV, see https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dpvcg/2020Jul/0003.html for details. > > - Harsh > > On 07/07/2020 11:55, OCG Info wrote: >> Hi Harsh, >> I am unable to make it to the meeting today unfortunately (competing work call) - but we very much would like to get some information on how the GA4GH exploration is going. Perhaps Paul or Jan can make the call in an hour. >> Kind Regards, >> - Mark >>> On 6 Jul 2020, at 17:10, OCG Info <info@openconsent.com> wrote: >>> >>> HI Harsh, (et al) >>> >>> This is quite the good list of items to do to get operational, >>> >>> I have a use case request, is it possible to pick up the GA4GH and discuss this work tomorrow? The reason I ask, there is a new workgroup, ToiP(Trust over IP) Decentralised Semantics, and its the first call tomorrow (after the DPV Call) and I think this might be of interest for DSWG as wee. As there is a keen interest in collecting and looking at these legal semantics in terms of application and use in/at GA4GH. >>> >>> Would it be a good idea to raise this topic tomorrow and get a report on what you have found so far ? >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> - Mark >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 6 Jul 2020, at 13:44, Harshvardhan J. Pandit <me@harshp.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear All, >>>> The following are some proposed future deliverables and timeline. >>>> I plan to update the group's main page on W3C with this information. >>>> Comments, suggestions, changes are welcome. >>>> >>>> The group functions based on interest and active participation from the community. Therefore, I invite everyone to contribute to the group as per their interest and time. >>>> In particular, where active participation is difficult - contributions through use-cases, FAQs, diagrams, documentation are welcome. >>>> >>>> ---- >>>> >>>> DPVCG should be working towards these deliverables: >>>> 1. Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV) v0.2 >>>> a) This would include more concepts in existing taxonomies >>>> b) This would also include more 'core' concepts - currently we have >>>> some proposed concepts in the Wiki taxonomy section >>>> c) It is important to keep the vocabulary evolving >>>> d) proposed timeline: have the next version published by September >>>> 2020 >>>> 2. Collection of use-cases, case studies, and requirements >>>> a) Use-cases are from existing adopters/implementers - industry as >>>> well as academia >>>> b) Case-studies are descriptions of situations where the DPV(CG) >>>> would be of use and benefit - these provide potential application >>>> and help drive discussion as well as demonstrate to outsiders what >>>> we work towards >>>> c) proposed timeline: collect and publish by September 2020 >>>> 3. Documentation for DPV use: Primer, Examples, and FAQ >>>> a) Primer: a simple guide for understanding DPV that is aimed for >>>> non-specialists -> this is important to get adoption >>>> IMHO. Proposed timeline is to have this published in August 2020. >>>> b) Examples: documented examples of using DPV for some common >>>> use-cases -> this is where implementers and people who are >>>> interested will look to for how the DPV can be used for some >>>> use-cases. This is an evolving deliverable, but we need some >>>> common items to start this. We can work on this based on the >>>> use-cases and case-studies as we collect them. >>>> c) FAQ: questions arise regarding usage, concepts, etc. The FAQ >>>> section is an area to collect such questions and the discussions >>>> surrounding it. This is also an evolving deliverable. >>>> >>>> Soft deliverables: >>>> 1. Maintain wiki >>>> a) e.g. concepts discussed on mailing list, references >>>> b) ongoing basis - needs volunteers >>>> 2. DPVCG contributors guide >>>> a) this is a guide for contributors to refer regarding how to propose >>>> concepts, how to look for existing concepts >>>> b) this is also an introduction to new participants to know more >>>> about the group >>>> c) ideally - we have a wiki page that does this >>>> 3. Documented process for addition of new concepts >>>> a) Currently, we have an item in the documentation that specifies >>>> providing a list of fields. We should create a dedicated page for >>>> contribution (see earlier point) with instructions on how to look >>>> up and align with existing terms, etc. >>>> b) This will allow more people to contribute terms and drive adoption >>>> 4. Re-implement ontology documentation generation (e.g. R2RML -> W3C >>>> ReSpec) >>>> a) The current implementation is based on a hack (git blame will show >>>> I'm responsible for this) that is not fit for continued use >>>> b) If we create a good pipeline for automatic ontology documentation >>>> - we can implenent it and forget it. >>>> c) I would propose having the process take a CSV file (like we >>>> currently have) and generate the corresponding documentation using >>>> W3C ReSpec (also what we currently use). >>>> 5. Better layout and diagrams for DPV documentation >>>> a) As title says, improve upon documentation with examples, clarity, >>>> diagrams, etc. >>>> b) No timeline for this, continue to improve with time. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Harsh >>>> >>>> >>>>> "Harshvardhan J. Pandit" <me@harshp.com> – June 22, 2020 10:05 AM >>>> >>>>>> This is listed as ACTION-139 on the tracker. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> --- >>>> Harshvardhan Pandit, Ph.D >>>> Researcher at ADAPT Centre, Trinity College Dublin >>>> https://harshp.com/research/ >>>> >>> > > -- > --- > Harshvardhan Pandit, Ph.D > Researcher at ADAPT Centre, Trinity College Dublin > https://harshp.com/research/
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2020 11:34:12 UTC