- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 16:50:33 +0200
- To: public-dpvcg <public-dpvcg@w3.org>
Thanks all for the productive meeting today, minutes here: https://www.w3.org/2019/09/03-dpvcg-minutes.html Axel -- Prof. Dr. Axel Polleres Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna url: http://www.polleres.net/ twitter: @AxelPolleres > On 03.09.2019, at 15:16, Harshvardhan J. Pandit <me@harshp.com> wrote: > > A few updates and items of interest: > > 1) A way to indicate a personal data category is PII > > This was an input from people at Dativa (Jan Lindquist and Paul Knowles) when I presented the DPV on a recurring hyperledger indy meeting call. > > They also have Blinding Identity Taxonomy (BIT) - a collection of personal data categories considered PII - which they'd like to see aligned or mapped to the DPV categories. See BIT list at https://www.dativa.com/blogs/blinding-identity-taxonomy/ > > 2) Issues found in the RDF / Ontology > > a. Organise is a subClass of itself > > b. dpv:Credit, dpv:Certification and dpv:Location in dpv.html each have two conflicting definitions. credit differs in parent class > > 3) Adding rdfs labels to all classes - they currently don't have any. > > > > Regarding moving forward, I think the priority should be on a use-case and examples type of document. This will be better for advertising, though I found there to be two types of audiences - (1) want the taxonomy but not the sem-web, and (2) want examples of usage. > > We can also keep call for feedback open indefinitely. > > See you on the call, > > Harsh > > > > On 03/09/2019 10:58, Axel Polleres wrote: >> Reminder - we will talk today at 16:00 CEST (I hope webex will work). >> Please try to call in, as this call shall re-initiate our work after the summer break! >> >> Dial-in info: see >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/internal-dpvcg/2018Aug/0000.html >> >> IRC: ircs://irc.w3.org/dpvcg (irc.w3.org channel #dpvcg) >> or connect a Web browser to http://irc.w3.org/ >> >> Agenda: >> >> 1) Roll call, select scribe, agenda >> >> 2) how to proceed to the next version of the spec? >> >> Schedule/timeplan until end of the year? >> getting back to a regular telco schedule to finish up our work >> Feedback/additions to discuss? >> - ODBASE paper accepted, we should incorporate the review revisions also into the spec drafts, where possible >> - how about a coherent complete example based on (one of) our use case(s)? >> - AFAIK, not too much feedback so far, but we should check the mailing-list archive again >> >> 3) further advertisement? >> - I suppose We still would welcome a) any additional feedback to the specs (concrete and constructive), and b) ideas to further advertise. >> >> 4) Action items >> https://www.w3.org/community/dpvcg/track/actions/open >> >> 5) Issues >> https://www.w3.org/community/dpvcg/track/issues >> >> (Note: I moved 4) and 5) deliberately to the end of the list, as I do not want to get stuck with old action item run-throughs but progress on a time plan) >> >> >> Hear you later! >> >> Axel >> >>> On 06.08.2019, at 17:21, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@wu.ac.at> wrote: >>> >>> Apparently, not too many people active at this point. >>> So I suggest to just postponse to Sept 3rd for now and collect feedback by then... >>> >>> If anyone has ideas to where to advertise/disseminate, please go ahead, let us know where you announced our drafts on the list! >>> We need the help of all group members to spread the word. >>> >>> You can use [1] as a template. >>> >>> Axel >>> >>> 1. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2019Jul/0087.html >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Prof. Dr. Axel Polleres >>> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna >>> url: http://www.polleres.net/ twitter: @AxelPolleres >>> >>>> On 06.08.2019, at 17:13, Harshvardhan J. Pandit <me@harshp.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Did the call happen or did I have connectivity issues? I could not see anyone else on the call. >>>> >>>> On 06/08/2019 09:14, Axel Polleres wrote: >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> I just see that we have scheduled a *sync call today, 16:00* >>>>> Unfortunately, I have to send regrets, so I hope Bert or Harsh could chair >>>>> I’d suggest to discuss the following items: >>>>> - how we can solicit more feedback and advertise further, (e.g. through the mydata channels?) >>>>> - check status of feedback and incorporating it >>>>> - discuss a timeline for a next draft and resolving open issues >>>>> Apart from that, I suggest the next meeting thereafter on Sept 3rd (unless you want to meet in between, feel free, but I will be on vacation) >>>>> Thanks & best regards, >>>>> Axel >>>>>> On 06.08.2019, at 00:01, Harshvardhan J. Pandit <me@harshp.com <mailto:me@harshp.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear All, Martin. >>>>>> I’ve created pull requests with the suggested changes on Github. >>>>>> They’re comparatively minor edits, so there’s no urgency in incorporating them. >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Harsh >>>>>> On 30 Jul 2019, 09:09 +0100, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@wu.ac.at <mailto:axel.polleres@wu.ac.at>>, wrote: >>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I fwd attached some comments from Martin (cc:ed, thanks a lot!) on the current spec document... we shall include that in the next public draft (along with transferring some rewordings and explanations we have done in the ODBASE paper submission)... >>>>>>> I would suggest we wait until we get reviews for ODBASE, then we can include all that in one go. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Axel >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Prof. Dr. Axel Polleres >>>>>>> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna >>>>>>> url: http://www.polleres.net/ twitter: @AxelPolleres >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> <DPVCG_drafts_comments_by_MK.pdf> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> --- >>>> Harshvardhan Pandit >>>> PhD Researcher >>>> ADAPT Centre >>>> Trinity College Dublin >>> >>> >> > -- > --- > Harshvardhan Pandit > PhD Researcher > ADAPT Centre > Trinity College Dublin >
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2019 14:51:01 UTC