Re: DPVCG call today - Please try to call in, as this call shall re-initiate our work after the summer break!

A few updates and items of interest:

1) A way to indicate a personal data category is PII

This was an input from people at Dativa (Jan Lindquist and Paul Knowles) 
when I presented the DPV on a recurring hyperledger indy meeting call.

They also have Blinding Identity Taxonomy (BIT) - a collection of 
personal data categories considered PII - which they'd like to see 
aligned or mapped to the DPV categories. See BIT list at 
https://www.dativa.com/blogs/blinding-identity-taxonomy/

2) Issues found in the RDF / Ontology

a. Organise is a subClass of itself

b. dpv:Credit, dpv:Certification and dpv:Location in dpv.html each have 
two conflicting definitions. credit differs in parent class

3) Adding rdfs labels to all classes - they currently don't have any.


Regarding moving forward, I think the priority should be on a use-case 
and examples type of document. This will be better for advertising, 
though I found there to be two types of audiences - (1) want the 
taxonomy but not the sem-web, and (2) want examples of usage.

We can also keep call for feedback open indefinitely.

See you on the call,

Harsh


On 03/09/2019 10:58, Axel Polleres wrote:
> Reminder - we will talk today at 16:00 CEST (I hope webex will work).
> Please try to call in, as this call shall re-initiate our work after 
> the summer break!
>
> Dial-in info: see
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/internal-dpvcg/2018Aug/0000.html
>
> IRC: ircs://irc.w3.org/dpvcg (irc.w3.org <http://irc.w3.org> channel 
> #dpvcg)
>   or connect a Web browser to http://irc.w3.org/
>
> Agenda:
>
> 1) Roll call, select scribe, agenda
>
> 2) how to proceed to the next version of the spec?
>
>  Schedule/timeplan until end of the year?
> getting back to a regular telco schedule to finish up our work
>  Feedback/additions to discuss?
>  - ODBASE paper accepted, we should incorporate the review revisions 
> also into the spec drafts, where possible
>  - how about a coherent complete example based on (one of) our use 
> case(s)?
>  - AFAIK, not too much feedback so far, but we should check the 
> mailing-list archive again
>
> 3) further advertisement?
>  - I suppose We still would welcome a) any additional feedback to the 
> specs (concrete and constructive), and b) ideas to further advertise.
>
> 4) Action items
> https://www.w3.org/community/dpvcg/track/actions/open
>
> 5) Issues
> https://www.w3.org/community/dpvcg/track/issues
>
> (Note: I moved 4) and 5) deliberately to the end of the list, as I do 
> not want to get stuck with old action item run-throughs but progress 
> on a time plan)
>
>
> Hear you later!
>
> Axel
>
>> On 06.08.2019, at 17:21, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@wu.ac.at 
>> <mailto:axel.polleres@wu.ac.at>> wrote:
>>
>> Apparently, not too many people active at this point.
>> So I suggest to just postponse to Sept 3rd  for now and collect 
>> feedback by then...
>>
>> If anyone has ideas to where to advertise/disseminate, please go 
>> ahead, let us know where you announced our drafts on the list!
>> We need the help of all group members to spread the word.
>>
>> You can use [1] as a template.
>>
>> Axel
>>
>> 1. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2019Jul/0087.html
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Prof. Dr. Axel Polleres
>> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna
>> url: http://www.polleres.net/  twitter: @AxelPolleres
>>
>>> On 06.08.2019, at 17:13, Harshvardhan J. Pandit <me@harshp.com 
>>> <mailto:me@harshp.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Did the call happen or did I have connectivity issues? I could not 
>>> see anyone else on the call.
>>>
>>> On 06/08/2019 09:14, Axel Polleres wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>> I just see that we have scheduled a *sync call today, 16:00*
>>>> Unfortunately, I have to send regrets, so I hope Bert or Harsh 
>>>> could chair
>>>> I’d suggest to  discuss the following items:
>>>> - how we can solicit more feedback and advertise further, (e.g. 
>>>> through the mydata channels?)
>>>> - check status of feedback and incorporating it
>>>> - discuss a timeline for a next draft and resolving open issues
>>>> Apart from that, I suggest the next meeting thereafter on Sept 3rd 
>>>> (unless you want to meet in between, feel free, but I will be on 
>>>> vacation)
>>>> Thanks & best regards,
>>>> Axel
>>>>> On 06.08.2019, at 00:01, Harshvardhan J. Pandit <me@harshp.com 
>>>>> <mailto:me@harshp.com> <mailto:me@harshp.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear All, Martin.
>>>>> I’ve created pull requests with the suggested changes on Github.
>>>>> They’re comparatively minor edits, so there’s no urgency in 
>>>>> incorporating them.
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Harsh
>>>>> On 30 Jul 2019, 09:09 +0100, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@wu.ac.at 
>>>>> <mailto:axel.polleres@wu.ac.at> <mailto:axel.polleres@wu.ac.at>>, 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I fwd attached some comments from Martin (cc:ed, thanks a lot!) 
>>>>>> on the current spec document... we shall include that in the next 
>>>>>> public draft (along with transferring some rewordings and 
>>>>>> explanations we have done in the ODBASE paper submission)...
>>>>>> I would suggest we wait until we get reviews for ODBASE, then we 
>>>>>> can include all that in one go.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Axel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Prof. Dr. Axel Polleres
>>>>>> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna
>>>>>> url: http://www.polleres.net/ twitter: @AxelPolleres
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> <DPVCG_drafts_comments_by_MK.pdf>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> ---
>>> Harshvardhan Pandit
>>> PhD Researcher
>>> ADAPT Centre
>>> Trinity College Dublin
>>
>>
>
-- 
---
Harshvardhan Pandit
PhD Researcher
ADAPT Centre
Trinity College Dublin