W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dpvcg@w3.org > May 2019

Re: rdfs:Resource for undefined range in properties

From: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 21:05:18 +0200
To: "Harshvardhan J. Pandit" <me@harshp.com>, Data Privacy Vocabularies and Controls Community Group <public-dpvcg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E1hPAq1-00062F-JF@titan.w3.org>
it certainly doesn't hurt, but imo also doesn't provide any additional benefit.. at least not under OWAbr simon
-------- Original message --------From: "Harshvardhan J. Pandit" <me@harshp.com> Date: 5/10/19  20:56  (GMT+01:00) To: Data Privacy Vocabularies and Controls Community Group <public-dpvcg@w3.org> Subject: rdfs:Resource for undefined range in properties Hello all.We have some properties that do not have the range defined (empty).Would stating that the range is rdfs:Resource be an option to have completeness in terms of metadata?See P11 in OOPS! http://oops.linkeddata.es/catalogue.jspAlso, should we use such tools/services to evaluate and ensure quality of ontology before release? (IMHO Yes)-- ---Harshvardhan PanditPhD ResearcherADAPT CentreTrinity College Dublin
Received on Friday, 10 May 2019 19:05:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:27:57 UTC