- From: Harshvardhan J. Pandit <me@harshp.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:39:50 +0200
- To: public-dpvcg@w3.org
Dear all, Should we list the terms/concepts/relationships of interest from the listed vocabularies on the wiki? We have ~16 vocabularies listed on the wiki. Although there is a section termed 'Relevance' in the description page, it would be of interest to list out the specifics in terms of concepts and relationships in the vocabulary that are of interest to the group. This could also be useful to kickstart a discussion on the semantics of these terms and concepts. As an example, consider 'consent', which is a term occurring or of relevance to several of the ontologies. However, each ontology has its own definition of the concept, and its own modelling regarding the context of consent. For example, the terms 'consent' and 'given consent' are used similarly but are incompatible across ontologies. A listing of such terms would be a good (IMHO) preliminary step in: a) identifying terms of interest already defined by existing work b) compare them for relevance This would also a better (again, IMHO) discussion regarding use-cases and creating requirements using these terms. E.g. terms/concepts applicable to define a particular use-cases Regards, Harsh -- --- Harshvardhan J. Pandit PhD Researcher ADAPT Centre, Trinity College Dublin https://harshp.com GPG: D81BF4F31D31B413
Received on Monday, 10 September 2018 09:40:15 UTC