- From: Harshvardhan J. Pandit <me@harshp.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 21:51:53 +0100
- To: public-dpvcg <public-dpvcg@w3.org>
Hello all, We discussed in the Vienna F2F about high-level purposes or dimensions using examples from MyData. Following that, on the 4th, we looked at Purposes as defined in Consent Receipt https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/infosharing/Appendix+CR+-+V.9.3+-+Example+Purpose+Categories TIt discusses things such as core functions (legitimate interest???), contracted service (contract???), contact requested (communication), personalisation, marketing, marketing by third parties. However, the last few purposes are very abstract as to their use and application. I like the distinction of categorising purposes at a high-level based on how they relate to the controller and the data subject (a point which Bud raised in the F2F) i.e. which of them are essential, which are legal, and which are complimentary, or which does the user have control over. This would be separate from any other categorisation, such as basaed on domain or service. There are examples of this being used in some privacy policies (in the wild, so to speak) as well. Regards, -- --- Harshvardhan J. Pandit PhD Researcher ADAPT Centre, Trinity College Dublin https://harshp.com/
Received on Sunday, 9 December 2018 20:52:17 UTC