- From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:43:51 -0500
- To: "public-diselect-editors@w3.org" <public-diselect-editors@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <p0611041ec1e532bd2c24@[128.31.34.39]>
At 12:10 PM +0000 29 01 2007, Rhys Lewis wrote: >Hello Al, > >Thanks again for your comments on the DISelect Last call. > >In your response to the disposition of comments for Gilman-8 [1], >you did not accept the disposition of the comment. In particular, >you asked that we find a way to help accelerate adoption of a >replacement for the 'em' unit with one based on the width of a zero >character in a font. > >I understand, as a result of a discussion at last week's Multigroup >Meeting in Boston [2], that the likely delay in getting this new >unit adopted through CSS means that the urgency to include it in >DISelect, or the associated XPath functions, is lower than >anticipated. As a result, I believe that you now are in a position >to accept the disposition of this comment. > >Perhaps you would be able to confirm that by posting to the list? Yes, I accept the disposition and thank you for the summary above. Al [PS below] >I should point out that DIWG agrees that relative measures of screen >size are a potentially important part of the delivery context. >Indeed, current work on the ontology for the delivery context does >include some measures, based on those from UAProf. I understand from >our conversation last week that measures such as these, based on >default font characteristics of the device and possibly subject to >user preference, would provide a suitable source of information for >your needs. The extensible nature of the DISelect XPath access >functions specification should enable such additional information to >be made available, in future, without requiring revision to the >DISelect documents. PS: yes, there's a place for device based average figures and also a place for basing decisions on user preferences where they have expressed them. Just for the record, the use case we discussed was conditions used in choices between multi-column and single-column layout topologies. [and extending to tachistoscopic presentation word by word in extreme cases] Al >Very best wishes >Rhys Lewis > > >[1] ><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2006OctDec/0011.html>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2006OctDec/0011.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2006OctDec/0004.html> >[2] ><http://www.w3.org/2007/01/MGMoverview>http://www.w3.org/2007/01/MGMoverview > >
Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2007 17:44:19 UTC