Re: posts turning out late in my inbox?

thanks folks, not important per se, just checking that we have our settings
right

if it was a spam filter issue, then Gavin would have received the message
directly because william replied both to the list and to Gav in cc, Gav can
you confirm that please

if that so, how did the message get unblocked from the spam filter just now?
did someone mechanically unspammed it, or does the system processes messages
in batches?

at least we know how much to rely on the list for real time for future
correspondence

Thanks a lot for your prompt support
P

On 6/20/07, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
> Paola,
>
> I forward your questions to our system people who may know the answer.
>
> However, the unfortunate fact is that, time to time, our spam filters
> are absolutely overloaded which does create, sometimes, long delays.
> (You should realize that we have tons of mailing lists and you do not
> even want to know the number of spams that are filtered out every days.
> A real disaster:-)
>
> Ivan
>
> paola.dimaio@gmail.com wrote:
> > HI Ivan
> > cc public list
> >
> > Just checking the dynamics of this mailing list
> >
> > william posted this message on june 20, 3.41 am , which si 12 hours ago
> > Gavin replied 8 hours ago
> > but I received it only 2 hours ago in my inbox
> >
> > could you please let me know what kind of email group settings could
> > prevent this (long) gaps
> > in the communication? are there any tricks that Iwe should know of?
> > thanks
> >
> > Paola
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: *William Waites* <ww@groovy.net <mailto:ww@groovy.net>>
> > Date: Jun 20, 2007 3:41 AM
> > Subject: Re: automagic notifications and coordination...
> > To: Gavin Treadgold <gt@kestrel.co.nz <mailto:gt@kestrel.co.nz>>
> > Cc: W3C Disaster Management Ontology List
> > <public-disaster-management-ont@w3.org
> > <mailto:public-disaster-management-ont@w3.org>>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 11:09:33PM +1200, Gavin Treadgold wrote:
> >>
> >> E.g. within the plan may be a list of people that need to be notified
> >> if a certain event occurs. Wouldn't it be fantastic if the simple act
> >> of editing the plan dynamically modified the actual group within the
> >> messaging module as soon as the change is submitted (and approved if
> >> required). And a link is created automatically next to the list in
> >> the plan that takes the user directly to the form to send out an
> >> alert using the messaging module.
> >
> > Nifty indeed, however in practical scenarios it is important to address
> > infrastructure that would normally be used for this sort of thing that
> > may not be available.
> >
> > As a case in point, in Southern Mississippi and Louisiana, in the wake
> > of Hurricane Katrina, it was a good month and a half or two months
> > before the cellular networks were functioning with any semblance of
> > normalcy and even then only in some areas. Notifications by SMS or
> > telephone call would have been impossible. All communications in the
> > region for the initial period coordinated with the assistance of the
> > Amateur Radio Service (excepting perhaps the US Navy and National Guard
> > who have their own UHF/VHF facilities). I believe that, at the
> > beginning at least, it was not well known by the various authorities
> > that the Amateur Radio Service *exists* to provide communications
> > support in emergency scenarios where the normal infrastructure is
> > non-existant or destroyed.
> >
> > Simply a caution about depending too much upon infrastructure that may
> > disappear the moment it is needed...
> >
> > Another anectode from that time concerns the FEMA web site that was
> > intended to allow survivours to claim their benefit disbursement from
> > the Federal Government (around $2k IIRC). Putting aside the red tape
> > associated with, "I have no ID, it was all washed away", there was a
> > very serious problem: the web site was constructed using proprietary
> > technology (in this case Microsoft's Active-X extensions). Why does this
> > matter? Well the dozens or hundreds of donated computers which many
> > volunteers attempted to set up for the survivours to use were useless
> > for this purpose because (1) the web site did not work with Linux and
> > (2) most of the computers were too old to run anything recent enough to
> > support the extensions required by FEMA's web site. This is one of the
> > clearest examples that I know of about proprietary and encumbered
> software
> > contributing directly to the misery and despair of very many people.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -w
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> > Paola Di Maio *****
> > School of Information Technology
> > Mae Fah Luang University
> > Chiang Rai - Thailand
> > *********************************************
>
> --
>
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>
>


-- 



Paola Di Maio *****
School of Information Technology
Mae Fah Luang University
Chiang Rai - Thailand
*********************************************