W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > February 2016

Re: [dpub-loc] Use Cases

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 09:37:56 +0100
Cc: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E2A3B96F-E62D-4535-AF4F-3582A8DAD3D9@w3.org>
To: Romain <rdeltour@gmail.com>

> On 4 Feb 2016, at 09:13, Romain <rdeltour@gmail.com> wrote:
> (sending again to the list)
>> On 04 Feb 2016, at 08:58, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com <mailto:lrosenth@adobe.com>> wrote:
>> Sorry I missed the call, as I would have voted against using github in this manner.  But since things have already started there, so be it.
> Using the GitHub tracker to discuss use cases individually had been "agreed on" (or at least presented) previously, see:
>   https://www.w3.org/2016/01/25-dpub-minutes.html#item03 <https://www.w3.org/2016/01/25-dpub-minutes.html#item03>
>   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2016Jan/0177.html <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2016Jan/0177.html>
> But -as an editor- I'm open to improving the process if you have suggestions. Why would have you voted against?
> I find that the tracker helps having organised discussions about individual issues. Of course, if one of the discussion diverges to a more general or fundamental point, we can always open a new issue or move the discussion to the list.


> Romain.

Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704

Received on Thursday, 4 February 2016 08:38:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:36:25 UTC