- From: Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 19:21:22 +0000
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Good, just what I was hoping you'd say. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin@berjon.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 3:01 PM To: Bill Kasdorf; Ivan Herman Cc: W3C Digital Publishing IG Subject: Re: Best citation format for accessibility On 23/09/2015 13:19 , Bill Kasdorf wrote: > That's not necessarily to disagree with your point. One of the reasons > I asked Robin if there was any inherent conflict—and this may not have > been clear—was the prospect of using BOTH in the same HTML page. So is > THAT a conflict? No, not at all, and there are very good use cases for using both. In the body of the text you could have <a href="#foo" role="dpub-biblioref">(17)</a> and then in the References section <li id="foo" role="dpub-biblioentry" typeof="schema:ScholarlyArticle"> ...lots of semantic-enhanced markup... </li>. -- • Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon • http://science.ai/ — intelligent science publishing •
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2015 19:21:52 UTC