W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > September 2015

Re: Best citation format for accessibility

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 06:39:00 +0200
Cc: Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E7F9018D-D656-49F9-A212-9CC85ED565C2@w3.org>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
That looks good to me indeed! It nicely separates what RDFa and what ARIA should be used for. Great example, actually.

Ivan

> On 23 Sep 2015, at 21:00 , Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote:
> 
> On 23/09/2015 13:19 , Bill Kasdorf wrote:
>> That's not necessarily to disagree with your point. One of the reasons I
>> asked Robin if there was any inherent conflict—and this may not have
>> been clear—was the prospect of using BOTH in the same HTML page. So is
>> THAT a conflict?
> 
> No, not at all, and there are very good use cases for using both.
> 
> In the body of the text you could have
> 
>  <a href="#foo" role="dpub-biblioref">(17)</a>
> 
> and then in the References section
> 
>  <li id="foo" role="dpub-biblioentry" typeof="schema:ScholarlyArticle">
>   ...lots of semantic-enhanced markup...
>  </li>.
> 
> --
> • Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
> • http://science.ai/ — intelligent science publishing
> •


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704





Received on Thursday, 24 September 2015 04:39:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:36:12 UTC