- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:45:20 -0500
- To: "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>
- Cc: Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@bell.net>, Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>, Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, "David MacDonald" <david100@sympatico.ca>, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 12:32:13 -0500 "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com> wrote: > <footnote class="marginal" role="note | footnote" > <! -- this wording is under discussion. Currently, “note” is an ARIA role [1]. “Footnote” may be added in DPUB module --> > <p>Bow wow wow ipsizzle dolor sit amizzle, shizzlin dizzle adipiscing brizzle. Cool sapien velit, aliquet volutpat, suscipit rizzle, doggy vizzle, arcu. Pellentesque egizzle nizzle. Rizzle eros... </p> </footnote> Looks good, in order to refer to the same footnote more than once one probably also needs something like <footnote name="ipsizzle1" ...> ....</footnote> and <footnote ref="ipsizzle1" /> > In our work with PF, we are recommending a “noteref” role as well (definition: “A reference to a note, typically appearing a superscripted symbol in the main body of text.”) Ah. Although possibly people will ask why it's not just an "a" element... > Once we get into publications in which we are trying to distinguish among authors of different notes (and perhaps at different times), I think we need to explore the Annotations model and/or RDFa. Makes sense. <footnote class="end auth3"> might be sufficient in a lot of cases. -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2015 03:45:30 UTC