- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 08:57:55 -0400
- To: public-did-wg@w3.org
On 6/8/20 6:55 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > On the other hand, the difference between the 16th and the 18th is so > small, that it may not be worth the trouble of re-generating everything, > so we may decide to stick to it after all. Hi Ivan, I suggested the 18th in the event that some in the group wanted to call a vote with a 7 day delay before publication. Placing the publication date on the 16th could potentially make the 7 day timeout from tomorrows call overlap, creating a possibility of the document being published on Tuesday morning CET, and then a last minute objection coming in. I should point out that the above is highly unlikely, and that the group doesn't need to follow the 7 day rule for a FPWD. I picked the 18th as a "worst case scenario" date. Agreed that we don't need to shift it back to the 16th. -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches
Received on Monday, 8 June 2020 12:58:09 UTC