Re: Upcoming proposals based on DID F2F consensus

Very much in favor of adopting this and getting did-core into a position
where it can take PRs to define properties.

We seem to be in a state where nothing can move forward without this, and
there are many PRs which are opened which IMO should all be closed until
this is resolved.

I'd like us to move faster if possible.

OS


ᐧ

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 10:36 AM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This email contains a set of proposals that I'd like to put to the group
> during the call tomorrow.
>
> Those of you subscribed to updates from the DID WG repositories might
> have seen a fairly big PR that implements the consensus position reached
> during the DID F2F regarding the structure of the specification. The PR
> is here:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/did-core/pull/186
>
> PROPOSAL: Merge PR #186 to implement structural changes to the
> specification as discussed during the recent DID WG F2F meeting.
>
> There was also consensus around establishing an interoperability
> registry at the recent DID F2F Meeting. I have put a skeleton of that
> registry together here and the group needs to adopt it as an item that
> the group is producing to act on the resolutions made at the F2F meeting:
>
> https://msporny.github.io/did-core-registry/
>
> PROPOSAL: Adopt https://msporny.github.io/did-core-registry/ as an
> Editors Draft for the DID WG's DID Core Registry.
>
> A number of concerns about the proper way to do an implementation, such
> as Sam Smith's KERI proposal, were raised at the DID F2F Meeting. There
> is a suggestion that the group needs a place to put this sort of
> guidance. I have put a skeleton document together for a DID
> Implementation Guide so that the group has a place to put this work:
>
> https://msporny.github.io/did-imp-guide/
>
> PROPOSAL: Adopt https://msporny.github.io/did-imp-guide/ as an Editors
> Draft for the DID WG's DID Implementation Guide.
>
> Note that all of the proposals above are meant to be editorial and are
> not meant to establish best practices or process or governance... we
> haven't had those discussions yet. These are merely placeholders so that
> we can have the implementation/process/governance discussions and have a
> place where we can put the results of those discussions.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches
> https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches
>
>

-- 
*ORIE STEELE*
Chief Technical Officer
www.transmute.industries

<https://www.transmute.industries>