- From: Dan Burnett <daniel.burnett@consensys.net>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 07:16:25 -0500
- To: Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, W3C DID Working Group <public-did-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJ-gw3FTu5qs3fVJRrZkyQSNED6SmiX-PcC+Pq4bDQydy9ZeEA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 2:25 PM Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries> wrote: > Very much in favor of adopting this and getting did-core into a position > where it can take PRs to define properties. > > We seem to be in a state where nothing can move forward without this, and > there are many PRs which are opened which IMO should all be closed until > this is resolved. > > I'd like us to move faster if possible. > The chairs are encouraged by your enthusiasm. We expect that within the next couple of weeks the editors will be asking for volunteers to move various issues and/or PRs forward. Are you ready? :) > > OS > > > ᐧ > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 10:36 AM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> This email contains a set of proposals that I'd like to put to the group >> during the call tomorrow. >> >> Those of you subscribed to updates from the DID WG repositories might >> have seen a fairly big PR that implements the consensus position reached >> during the DID F2F regarding the structure of the specification. The PR >> is here: >> >> https://github.com/w3c/did-core/pull/186 >> >> PROPOSAL: Merge PR #186 to implement structural changes to the >> specification as discussed during the recent DID WG F2F meeting. >> >> There was also consensus around establishing an interoperability >> registry at the recent DID F2F Meeting. I have put a skeleton of that >> registry together here and the group needs to adopt it as an item that >> the group is producing to act on the resolutions made at the F2F meeting: >> >> https://msporny.github.io/did-core-registry/ >> >> PROPOSAL: Adopt https://msporny.github.io/did-core-registry/ as an >> Editors Draft for the DID WG's DID Core Registry. >> >> A number of concerns about the proper way to do an implementation, such >> as Sam Smith's KERI proposal, were raised at the DID F2F Meeting. There >> is a suggestion that the group needs a place to put this sort of >> guidance. I have put a skeleton document together for a DID >> Implementation Guide so that the group has a place to put this work: >> >> https://msporny.github.io/did-imp-guide/ >> >> PROPOSAL: Adopt https://msporny.github.io/did-imp-guide/ as an Editors >> Draft for the DID WG's DID Implementation Guide. >> >> Note that all of the proposals above are meant to be editorial and are >> not meant to establish best practices or process or governance... we >> haven't had those discussions yet. These are merely placeholders so that >> we can have the implementation/process/governance discussions and have a >> place where we can put the results of those discussions. >> >> -- manu >> >> -- >> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) >> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >> blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches >> https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches >> >> > > -- > *ORIE STEELE* > Chief Technical Officer > www.transmute.industries > > <https://www.transmute.industries> >
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2020 12:17:14 UTC