- From: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 13:16:27 +0200
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Cc: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>, Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>, Yoav Weiss <yoavweiss@google.com>, Addy Osmani <addyo@google.com>, "TOREINI, EHSAN" <ehsan.toreini@durham.ac.uk>, Noam Helfman <noamh@microsoft.com>, Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>, Tarun Bansal <tbansal@google.com>, W3C Devices and Sensors WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALgRrLnuY5Pw6aLBjt6P3-qqZDVWJhc=7qMqfpH3TX5QASv16w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, I have rebooted the Network Information API based on long-going discussions with @Yoav Weiss <yoavweiss@google.com> (who currently is still OoO): - Motivational doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RDA23zSNdDuIcxZTX9Xo3zlD2fxf8dZg9-e0YaJQv0g/edit?usp=sharing - Explainer: https://github.com/tomayac/netinfo/blob/relaunch/README.md - Spec draft: https://ghcdn.rawgit.org/tomayac/netinfo/relaunch/index.html This is all in a relatively early stage, but I thought now would be a good time to get early feedback. Cheers, Tom On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:04 AM Kostiainen, Anssi < anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I just opened two GH issues to discuss the DAS WG TPAC proceedings for the > Network Information API. > > Maybe we'll move this discussion to the spec GH repo to have more eyeballs > on the issues? See inline. > > On 26. Oct 2020, at 11.09, Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 4:51 PM Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com> > wrote: > >> Hey all. >> >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 5:12 AM Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks, all, for the responses so far. The initial question for @Ilya >>> Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com> still stands (whether there's still >>> some active spec work happening). >>> >> >> +Yoav Weiss <yoavweiss@google.com> captured it well, there is desire but >> no active spec work to address some of the lessons learned. If someone is >> willing to drive that process, that'd be great. >> > > Thanks for the update, Ilya! I guess it's up to the two WGs' chairs then > to see if and how to collaborate on this spec then, right? > > > https://github.com/WICG/netinfo/issues/88 > > Also, thanks, Addy, for the household names, we definitely have some >> strong industry representatives in there and can thus say the use cases are >> indeed valid and on active use. >> >>> >>> For the use cases in fact, there's some great discussion happening >>> already in issue 85 <https://github.com/WICG/netinfo/issues/85>, with >>> the "metered" aspects being the topic of issue 84 >>> <https://github.com/WICG/netinfo/issues/84>. So I guess we're in a >>> theoretically good position to continue this discussion and just need to >>> agree on a practical way as to the how. Is this an adequate summary of the >>> state of affairs? >>> >> >> Yes, I'd just caution not to over-index on the past backlog and first >> spend some quality time on unpacking lessons learned from what is already >> out there, and have a think on whether there is a simpler implementation >> that can satisfy the key needs whilst exposing less entropy. >> > > I agree. @Addy Osmani <addyo@google.com>, are you in a position to > provide some insights here? And @Yoav Weiss <yoavweiss@google.com>, you > the WG members would probably have opinions on this, too. Is it worth > opening an Issue to collect new use cases and another one to reflect on > existing use cases? > > > https://github.com/WICG/netinfo/issues/87 > > Thanks, > > -Anssi (DAS WG co-chair) > > -- Thomas Steiner, PhD—Developer Advocate (https://blog.tomayac.com, https://twitter.com/tomayac) Google Germany GmbH, ABC-Str. 19, 20354 Hamburg, Germany Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.1.23 (GNU/Linux) iFy0uwAntT0bE3xtRa5AfeCheCkthAtTh3reSabiGbl0ck0fjumBl3DCharaCTersAttH3b0ttom. hTtPs://xKcd.cOm/1181/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 13 August 2021 11:16:58 UTC