- From: Zhang, Zhiqiang <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 01:21:41 +0000
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>
- CC: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, W3C Device APIs WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Hi Anssi, Frederick, > From: Kostiainen, Anssi > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 19:59 > To: Frederick Hirsch; Zhang, Zhiqiang > Cc: Marcos Caceres; W3C Device APIs WG; Dominique Hazael-Massieux > Subject: Re: [battery] Battery testing and implementation report update > > Hi Frederick, Zhiqiang, > > > On 06 Feb 2015, at 18:10, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com> wrote: > > > > Currently the Battery Status API implementation report shows only one > implementation (Firefox) for the Battery Status API: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/ImplementationStatus > > > > It looks like Chromium has both a desktop and Android implementation for > Chromium 38, or am I mistaken? > > > > https://www.chromestatus.com/features/4537134732017664 > > Chromium implementation per the latest CR is shipping, while the Firefox > implementation is being revised to match the latest CR (Firefox implements > an earlier versions of the spec, pre-promises). > > I updated the wiki accordingly. Thanks for the info and update. > > If this is the case the following additional steps are needed: > > > > 1. Run the tests on the Chromium implementations > > Correct, but only after ACTION-730 has been addressed (as you noted in your > response): > > https://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/actions/730 > > > 2. Create an implementation report document, similar to what we have for > the Vibration API, http://w3c.github.io/test-results/vibration/20141118.html > > > > Once we have an updated implementation report I think we can consider > progressing the Battery Status API to PR. > > > > Are you able to work on this and do you have an estimate of how long it > might take? > > Zhiqiang is probably able to estimate how big an effort it'd be to update the > test suite to match the latest spec (and will also welcome PRs :-)). I sent > some suggestions for tasks at: > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2015Feb/0005.html Thanks again for the suggestions. I am working on the tests update. Hope to finish them in this week and make an initiative testing report before the Chinese New Year holidays (Feb. 17th). > Someone from Mozilla's side may be able to give us a guesstimate for > updating the implementation. I think the person to whom the > implementation is assigned to is not in this WG. > > After the test suite is revised and Mozilla has updated its implementation, > we can consider progressing to PR. This sounds great. Thanks, Zhiqiang
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2015 01:22:28 UTC