- From: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:18:40 -0400
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>, "Zhang, Zhiqiang" <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>, W3C Device APIs WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Indeed, one could argue this is adequate for transitioning out of CR into PR. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch, Nokia Chair DAP @fjhirsch On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:34 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Zhiqiang, Frederick, > > On 02 Sep 2014, at 11:10, Zhang, Zhiqiang <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com> wrote: > >> I just created some Vibration tests at https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/1224, please help review them. >> >> http://w3c-test.org/submissions/1224/vibration/cancel-when-hidden-manual.html >> http://w3c-test.org/submissions/1224/vibration/invalid-values.html >> >> These tests shall fulfill the gaps mentioned by the TODO.txt reflecting the latest spec. >> >> http://w3c-test.org/submissions/1224/vibration/cancel-with-array-0-manual.html >> >> This test shall address the feedback at >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2014Jul/0059.html >> >> ... of treating navigator.vibrate([0]) as a cancellation, which is also added into the latest spec. > > Zhiqiang - thanks, your tests look good to me. Please merge and update the test results [1] accordingly. > > Frederick - I believe we should be good to go to CR now. The test suite is complete AFAICT and we have two implementations. I think this qualifies as adequate implementation experience. > > Thanks, > > -Anssi > > [1] http://w3c.github.io/test-results/vibration/all.html >
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 19:19:08 UTC