Re: DAP-ISSUE-167: Should Promises be used in Battery API [Battery Status API]

Hi All,

On 08 Aug 2014, at 13:53, Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote:

> Also, it’d be helpful to get confirmation on Mozilla’s position. In April we heard (via Google’s participant) Mozilla "has indicated that they would be fine with such change” [4], but no names were mentioned.

[Replying to self.]

Mozilla is in process of updating its implementation to match the latest promise-based API, see [1].

Also, yesterday, an “Intent to Ship” [2] was sent to the blink-dev mailing list, signalling the promise-based API would be enabled in Chrome by default.

With these recent advancements, it seems we're converging toward the promise-based API, and should think about publishing the revised API soon. I suggest we wait and bake in Mozilla’s implementation feedback (if any) before publishing an updated LC (and address the open issues in the tracker).

Thanks,

-Anssi

[1] https://bugzil.la/1047119
[2] https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/blink-dev/zCH2VD1QQSA/POZ6GkqysIEJ

Received on Friday, 8 August 2014 11:13:30 UTC