Re: Vibration API: clamp argument

Le mardi 22 octobre 2013 à 12:23 +0100, Michael van Ouwerkerk a écrit :
> Hi, would it make sense to add the [Clamp] attribute to the argument
> of the vibrate method? This would be added in WebIDL.

> Without it, navigator.vibrate(-1) becomes
> navigator.vibrate(4294967295).

> It seems clamping it to 0 would be a more elegant way of handling this
> bad input.
> What do you think?

+1

Dom