W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > October 2013

Re: Vibration API: clamp argument

From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:07:58 +0200
Message-ID: <1382443678.5025.147.camel@cumulustier>
To: Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@chromium.org>
Cc: "<public-device-apis@w3.org>" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Le mardi 22 octobre 2013 à 12:23 +0100, Michael van Ouwerkerk a écrit :
> Hi, would it make sense to add the [Clamp] attribute to the argument
> of the vibrate method? This would be added in WebIDL.

> Without it, navigator.vibrate(-1) becomes
> navigator.vibrate(4294967295).

> It seems clamping it to 0 would be a more elegant way of handling this
> bad input.
> What do you think?

+1

Dom
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2013 12:08:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:01 UTC