- From: Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:23:40 +0100
- To: "<public-device-apis@w3.org>" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2013 11:24:07 UTC
Hi, would it make sense to add the [Clamp] attribute to the argument of the vibrate method? This would be added in WebIDL. See the Clamp attribute here: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#Clamp Without it, navigator.vibrate(-1) becomes navigator.vibrate(4294967295). It seems clamping it to 0 would be a more elegant way of handling this bad input. What do you think? Regards, Michael
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2013 11:24:07 UTC