Re: Vibration API: clamp argument

Note that there is some concern that [Clamp] cannot be applied to the
contents of a sequence:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23623

It seems even the desired syntax is not fully agreed.

Regards,

Michael


On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>wrote:

> Le mardi 22 octobre 2013 à 12:23 +0100, Michael van Ouwerkerk a écrit :
> > Hi, would it make sense to add the [Clamp] attribute to the argument
> > of the vibrate method? This would be added in WebIDL.
>
> > Without it, navigator.vibrate(-1) becomes
> > navigator.vibrate(4294967295).
>
> > It seems clamping it to 0 would be a more elegant way of handling this
> > bad input.
> > What do you think?
>
> +1
>
> Dom
>
>
>