Note that there is some concern that [Clamp] cannot be applied to the contents of a sequence: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23623 It seems even the desired syntax is not fully agreed. Regards, Michael On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>wrote: > Le mardi 22 octobre 2013 à 12:23 +0100, Michael van Ouwerkerk a écrit : > > Hi, would it make sense to add the [Clamp] attribute to the argument > > of the vibrate method? This would be added in WebIDL. > > > Without it, navigator.vibrate(-1) becomes > > navigator.vibrate(4294967295). > > > It seems clamping it to 0 would be a more elegant way of handling this > > bad input. > > What do you think? > > +1 > > Dom > > >Received on Thursday, 31 October 2013 15:40:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:01 UTC