- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:52:23 +0200
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: "public-device-apis@w3.org public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hi Art, Le vendredi 23 août 2013 à 07:48 -0400, Arthur Barstow a écrit : > just wondering if the group considered using WebIDL's > "conforming IDL fragment" conformance class instead (as it could reduce > the testing and implementation requirements to exit CR). While I think this might be OK for specs that were implemented before WebIDL was so well-defined (e.g. Web Storage and Geolocation), I feel this would be stretching it to apply it to specs that are being implemented now (or otherwise, we might just as well drop all the semantics of WebIDL :) Dom
Received on Monday, 26 August 2013 08:52:38 UTC