- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:48:52 -0400
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- CC: "public-device-apis@w3.org public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
On 8/14/13 11:16 AM, ext Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Both Ambient Light and Proximity should have a normative dependency on > WebIDL; that reference would likely be linked from the conformance > section as done in other specs, e.g.: > Implementations that use ECMAScript to implement the APIs > defined in this specification must implement them in a manner > consistent with the ECMAScript Bindings defined in the Web IDL > specification [WEBIDL], as this specification uses that > specification and terminology. Hi Dom - just wondering if the group considered using WebIDL's "conforming IDL fragment" conformance class instead (as it could reduce the testing and implementation requirements to exit CR). -Thanks, AB
Received on Friday, 23 August 2013 11:49:23 UTC