W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > March 2010

RE: SystemInfo: DisplayDevice

From: Tran, Dzung D <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:07:09 -0700
To: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>, Max Froumentin <maxfro@opera.com>
CC: "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <753F67ADE6F5094C9F1DBA00D1BAA8D325509DE500@orsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
Yes, I thought we decided at one time in the WG to have System-info as read only for v1.

Dzung Tran

-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin@robineko.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 05:00 AM
To: Max Froumentin
Cc: Tran, Dzung D; public-device-apis@w3.org
Subject: Re: SystemInfo: DisplayDevice

On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:28 , Max Froumentin wrote:
> Yes, some are quite far-fetched, but I listed them for the sake of argument. If we found that _none_ of them should be settable, then we should get rid of set(). But do we not want to be able to set the brightness, for instance, according to the intensity of the ambient light?

Thinking out loud here, but would it be valuable to ship a v1 that was read-only and add set() in the next rev?

Robin Berjon
  robineko - hired gun, higher standards
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:07:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:32:18 UTC