W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > March 2010

Re: SystemInfo: DisplayDevice

From: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:00:28 +0100
Cc: "Tran, Dzung D" <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-Id: <18F3D4AF-B579-412A-B0F4-1D1C7E45460C@robineko.com>
To: Max Froumentin <maxfro@opera.com>
On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:28 , Max Froumentin wrote:
> Yes, some are quite far-fetched, but I listed them for the sake of argument. If we found that _none_ of them should be settable, then we should get rid of set(). But do we not want to be able to set the brightness, for instance, according to the intensity of the ambient light?

Thinking out loud here, but would it be valuable to ship a v1 that was read-only and add set() in the next rev?

Robin Berjon
  robineko  hired gun, higher standards
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 12:01:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:42 UTC