W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > August 2010

Re: to publish new WD of Access Control Use Cases and Requirements; deadline Aug 31

From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:22:48 +0200
To: <Claes1.Nilsson@sonyericsson.com>
CC: <public-device-apis@w3.org>, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Message-ID: <E8E61068-A18A-44CF-A377-08782C310EC3@nokia.com>
As another data point, the Widgets Requirements document is non-normative yet uses capitalized MUST language for requirements. Seems to make sense to specify requirements with that language since they are "requirements", but I understand the concern.

http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/

I didn't find any guidance in the W3C Manual of Style or Process document.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:

> Claes
> 
> I'd expect this to be an informative note. 
> 
> I think we should publish since it represents an update from what we have had previously, but publishing should not stop contributions and continued work on it.
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 31, 2010, at 7:50 AM, ext Nilsson, Claes1 wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I still think that there are much vagueness in the document. This especially applies to section 3 on "Trusted Widget or Application" use case. We really need more discussion on this use case. Furthermore, I am not 100% convinced that this should be a normative document.
>> 
>> However, as said before, public publishing may be a way to get wider feedback so I can say +1, not because I feel comfortable but to (hopefully) get more flesh on the bones from people outside of DAP.
>> 
>> Regards
>> Claes 
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org [mailto:public-device-apis-
>>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
>>> Sent: den 25 augusti 2010 16:45
>>> To: public-device-apis@w3.org
>>> Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
>>> Subject: CfC: to publish new WD of Access Control Use Cases and
>>> Requirements; deadline Aug 31
>>> 
>>> On today's call we discussed publishing an update of the "Device API
>>> Access Control Use Cases and Requirements" in the spirit of publish
>>> early and often.
>>> 
>>> This is a call for consensus to see if there are any objections to
>>> publishing an updated WD of the Device API Access Control Use Cases
>>> and Requirements document (last published 29 June 2010).
>>> 
>>> The draft can be read at:
>>> http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/policy-reqs/
>>> 
>>> This draft  is a clarification and update to the previous publication
>>> reflecting our recent discussions. Publishing an update should give
>>> this wider visibility and enable others to see the progression of the
>>> work.
>>> 
>>> Where CfCs are concerned, silence is considered to be assent, but
>>> positive support is preferred (even if simply with a +1). Please send
>>> feedback by next Tuesday (Aug 31).
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> regards, Frederick
>>> 
>>> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
>>> Co-Chair, DAP WG
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:23:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:32:22 UTC