W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > August 2010

Re: to publish new WD of Access Control Use Cases and Requirements; deadline Aug 31

From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:44:26 +0200
To: <Claes1.Nilsson@sonyericsson.com>
CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B3364F63-0A4C-4003-960D-CDF745FC9DE4@nokia.com>

I'd expect this to be an informative note. 

I think we should publish since it represents an update from what we have had previously, but publishing should not stop contributions and continued work on it.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch

On Aug 31, 2010, at 7:50 AM, ext Nilsson, Claes1 wrote:

> Hi,
> I still think that there are much vagueness in the document. This especially applies to section 3 on "Trusted Widget or Application" use case. We really need more discussion on this use case. Furthermore, I am not 100% convinced that this should be a normative document.
> However, as said before, public publishing may be a way to get wider feedback so I can say +1, not because I feel comfortable but to (hopefully) get more flesh on the bones from people outside of DAP.
> Regards
>  Claes 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org [mailto:public-device-apis-
>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
>> Sent: den 25 augusti 2010 16:45
>> To: public-device-apis@w3.org
>> Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
>> Subject: CfC: to publish new WD of Access Control Use Cases and
>> Requirements; deadline Aug 31
>> On today's call we discussed publishing an update of the "Device API
>> Access Control Use Cases and Requirements" in the spirit of publish
>> early and often.
>> This is a call for consensus to see if there are any objections to
>> publishing an updated WD of the Device API Access Control Use Cases
>> and Requirements document (last published 29 June 2010).
>> The draft can be read at:
>> http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/policy-reqs/
>> This draft  is a clarification and update to the previous publication
>> reflecting our recent discussions. Publishing an update should give
>> this wider visibility and enable others to see the progression of the
>> work.
>> Where CfCs are concerned, silence is considered to be assent, but
>> positive support is preferred (even if simply with a +1). Please send
>> feedback by next Tuesday (Aug 31).
>> Thanks!
>> regards, Frederick
>> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
>> Co-Chair, DAP WG
Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2010 12:46:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:32:22 UTC