- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:26:50 +0200
- To: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, <Claes1.Nilsson@sonyericsson.com>, <public-device-apis@w3.org>
It's something that one would normally explain in the status of this document section. In the case of widgets-reqs, that's not done very clearly. Something along the following lines should do: > "This document is not normative. The Working Group expects to evolve this document further and will eventually publish a stable version as a Working Group Note." Cheers, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler) On 31 Aug 2010, at 15:22, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote: > As another data point, the Widgets Requirements document is non-normative yet uses capitalized MUST language for requirements. Seems to make sense to specify requirements with that language since they are "requirements", but I understand the concern. > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/ > > I didn't find any guidance in the W3C Manual of Style or Process document. > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > > > > On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote: > >> Claes >> >> I'd expect this to be an informative note. >> >> I think we should publish since it represents an update from what we have had previously, but publishing should not stop contributions and continued work on it. >> >> regards, Frederick >> >> Frederick Hirsch >> Nokia >> >> >> >> On Aug 31, 2010, at 7:50 AM, ext Nilsson, Claes1 wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I still think that there are much vagueness in the document. This especially applies to section 3 on "Trusted Widget or Application" use case. We really need more discussion on this use case. Furthermore, I am not 100% convinced that this should be a normative document. >>> >>> However, as said before, public publishing may be a way to get wider feedback so I can say +1, not because I feel comfortable but to (hopefully) get more flesh on the bones from people outside of DAP. >>> >>> Regards >>> Claes >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org [mailto:public-device-apis- >>>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com >>>> Sent: den 25 augusti 2010 16:45 >>>> To: public-device-apis@w3.org >>>> Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com >>>> Subject: CfC: to publish new WD of Access Control Use Cases and >>>> Requirements; deadline Aug 31 >>>> >>>> On today's call we discussed publishing an update of the "Device API >>>> Access Control Use Cases and Requirements" in the spirit of publish >>>> early and often. >>>> >>>> This is a call for consensus to see if there are any objections to >>>> publishing an updated WD of the Device API Access Control Use Cases >>>> and Requirements document (last published 29 June 2010). >>>> >>>> The draft can be read at: >>>> http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/policy-reqs/ >>>> >>>> This draft is a clarification and update to the previous publication >>>> reflecting our recent discussions. Publishing an update should give >>>> this wider visibility and enable others to see the progression of the >>>> work. >>>> >>>> Where CfCs are concerned, silence is considered to be assent, but >>>> positive support is preferred (even if simply with a +1). Please send >>>> feedback by next Tuesday (Aug 31). >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> regards, Frederick >>>> >>>> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia >>>> Co-Chair, DAP WG >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:26:58 UTC