RE: to publish new WD of Access Control Use Cases and Requirements; deadline Aug 31

Hi,

I still think that there are much vagueness in the document. This especially applies to section 3 on "Trusted Widget or Application" use case. We really need more discussion on this use case. Furthermore, I am not 100% convinced that this should be a normative document.

However, as said before, public publishing may be a way to get wider feedback so I can say +1, not because I feel comfortable but to (hopefully) get more flesh on the bones from people outside of DAP.

Regards
  Claes 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org [mailto:public-device-apis-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
> Sent: den 25 augusti 2010 16:45
> To: public-device-apis@w3.org
> Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
> Subject: CfC: to publish new WD of Access Control Use Cases and
> Requirements; deadline Aug 31
> 
> On today's call we discussed publishing an update of the "Device API
> Access Control Use Cases and Requirements" in the spirit of publish
> early and often.
> 
> This is a call for consensus to see if there are any objections to
> publishing an updated WD of the Device API Access Control Use Cases
> and Requirements document (last published 29 June 2010).
> 
> The draft can be read at:
> http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/policy-reqs/
> 
> This draft  is a clarification and update to the previous publication
> reflecting our recent discussions. Publishing an update should give
> this wider visibility and enable others to see the progression of the
> work.
> 
> Where CfCs are concerned, silence is considered to be assent, but
> positive support is preferred (even if simply with a +1). Please send
> feedback by next Tuesday (Aug 31).
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
> Co-Chair, DAP WG
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2010 11:50:37 UTC