- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:53:52 -0500
- To: ext Max Froumentin <maxfro@opera.com>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, W3C Device APIs and Policy WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Shouldn't camera metadata be associated with capture, especially when settable? It seems an application using the camera might wish to set white balance etc without going into a different API module. Which reminds me, how are we coordinating with the W3C Media Annotations WG? Should we be? http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/ regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Dec 11, 2009, at 10:44 AM, ext Max Froumentin wrote: > Hi all, > > Where do properties relating to cameras or microphones, like zoom > factor, flash on/off, depth of field, etc. go? In Capture, or in > SysInfo? > > It seems to make more sense to put them in Capture, since it's > parameters you want to access/control when you record sound or > pictures. > Even if it could be claimed that many of the parameters are hardware > related and should thus be in sysinfo, it's hard to see where the > split > should be so I think we might as well just put everything together. > > Max. >
Received on Friday, 11 December 2009 21:54:55 UTC