Re: Next steps on Capture API?

On 8.12.2009, at 20.03, ext Tran, Dzung D wrote:

>  I was wondering what would be our next steps in the Capture API.  
> There are lot of discussions going on in the WG. I think we need to  
> come to a consensus, so that we can make some progress on the API.
> Here is a list of all the discussions so far:
> 1. Keep it simple and let all the configurations happen natively in  
> the native Camera Application
> 2. Add configuration options for v1.
> 2. <input type=...> as the API
> 3.
> 4. Adding websocket as a parameter Capture, don't know how this will  
> work.
> 5. Viewfinder in v1?
> ...
> ...anything else that I miss

The Capture API got some public review via Ajaxian (thanks Dion!):


There are some good comments so I think the spec editors should follow  
up and perhaps invite interested people to join the discussion on this  


Received on Thursday, 10 December 2009 08:52:08 UTC