Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33)

Could we please move this discussion elsewhere, as it's off-topic for this thread? @anssiko, let's try to stay focused and avoid any further delays. Comparing .vibrate() to WebRTC doesn't seem appropriate.

For browser APIs, we rely on Gecko, Chromium, and WebKit as our reference points. This is why we have initiatives like [Interop 2024](https://web.dev/blog/interop-2024). The definition of "interop" is clear. If you have questions, referring to the Interop project should provide the answers.

@reillyeon, would you like me to draft the report? It seems like progress has stalled, and we need to keep things moving forward.

@anssiko, I encourage you to review the available resources (e.g., a Google search, asking ChatGTP) to find the information you need rather than waiting on others to do it for you.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by marcoscaceres
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/vibration/issues/33#issuecomment-2154154421 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 7 June 2024 06:14:41 UTC